California County Health Scorecard: Connected Adolescents

2010 California County Scorecard | Home

For this indicator, the performance of California counties ranges from a low of 57% to a high of 82%.

Individual county performances on the above indicator are grouped below into six categories, based on population density (i.e., "Rural" or "Urban") and per capita income of families with children (i.e., "High Income," "Middle Income," or "Low Income"). In doing so, the Scorecard encourages its users to look beyond the data from their own county, to the data of counties with similar physical and economic environments, as a way to discover new, effective strategies being used by other communities with comparable constraints and resources.

Printable Downloads:
This Page | Complete Report

HOW TO USE THE SCORECARD

Hover over any "i" icon to view a complete definition of the item.
Click on any county to view the county's performance on all 26 indicators.
Additional resources, including definitions, tutorials, and notes and sources, are available here.

High Income, Rural

	Bottom	Middle	Top	Trend	Latino	White	African American	Asian	Other
Alpine	NA			NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
El Dorado			78%	+5%	67%	81%	69%	69%	79%
Mono			74%	+12%	73%	76%	NA	NA	71%
Nevada			79%	+10%	65%	82%	63%	69%	74%
San Luis Obispo			75%	+6%	67%	79%	60%	67%	75%

NA - Not Available

High Income, Urban

	Bottom	Middle	Top	Trend	Latino	White	African American	Asian	Other
Alameda	69%			+13%	66%	78%	71%	60%	70%
Contra Costa		71%		+6%	66%	77%	66%	67%	70%
Marin			77%	+13%	68%	81%	72%	68%	75%
Napa			74%	+7%	71%	79%	66%	70%	72%
Orange		72%		+9%	69%	80%	68%	65%	72%
Placer			79%	+10%	74%	83%	63%	77%	72%
San Diego		72%		+9%	68%	79%	70%	69%	72%
San Francisco	57%			+8%	60%	78%	66%	51%	66%
San Mateo		72%		+13%	69%	79%	71%	67%	73%
Santa Barbara	69%			+15%	66%	78%	56%	63%	68%
Santa Clara	68%			+8%	65%	77%	63%	63%	71%
Santa Cruz		71%		+4%	63%	80%	51%	69%	68%
Sonoma		70%		0%	61%	76%	61%	60%	69%
Ventura		73%		+9%	69%	79%	66%	68%	73%

NA - Not Available

Middle Income, Rural

	Bottom	Middle	Top	Trend	Latino	White	African American	Asian	Other
Amador			75%	+4%	71%	75%	NA	NA	78%
Butte			76%	+13%	70%	81%	67%	65%	76%
Calaveras			81%	+9%	70%	84%	81%	57%	79%
Humboldt			77%	+7%	70%	80%	72%	72%	73%
Inyo			74%	+1%	65%	86%	NA	NA	69%
Mariposa			76%	+0%	67%	80%	NA	NA	69%
Mendocino			74%	+6%	68%	81%	65%	51%	74%
Monterey		70%		+15%	68%	77%	69%	67%	70%
Plumas			76%	+6%	66%	80%	53%	NA	75%
San Benito			75%	+12%	72%	79%	62%	66%	77%
Shasta			77%	+10%	72%	80%	50%	69%	75%
Sierra	68%			-1%	74%	78%	NA	NA	26%
Tuolumne			80%	+5%	81%	83%	55%	48%	73%

NA - Not Available

Middle Income, Urban

	Bottom	Middle	Top	Trend	Latino	White	African American	Asian	Other
Los Angeles	69%			+15%	68%	77%	70%	64%	70%
Riverside		71%		+13%	67%	78%	73%	66%	70%
Sacramento		71%		+16%	68%	78%	73%	61%	70%
San Joaquin	68%			+13%	65%	77%	70%	59%	69%
Solano		70%		+6%	65%	78%	70%	62%	69%
Sutter		72%		+4%	65%	78%	73%	75%	70%
Yolo		71%		+6%	68%	78%	63%	58%	72%

NA - Not Available

Low Income, Rural

	Bottom	Middle	Top	Trend	Latino	White	African American	Asian	Other
Colusa	67%			+2%	61%	83%	NA	49%	63%
Del Norte		72%		+4%	58%	75%	NA	50%	78%
Glenn		73%		-4%	79%	70%	61%	62%	70%
Imperial		70%		+21%	69%	79%	73%	60%	68%
Kern		73%		+11%	69%	81%	77%	69%	73%
Kings	68%			+3%	64%	79%	69%	66%	71%
Lake		71%		+1%	69%	74%	76%	NA	65%
Lassen			74%	+7%	74%	77%	NA	NA	64%
Madera	65%			0%	62%	76%	60%	53%	70%
Merced	69%			+11%	68%	77%	69%	58%	73%
Modoc			82%	+9%	NA	85%	NA	NA	79%
San Bernardino		70%		+11%	68%	75%	71%	64%	71%
Siskiyou			75%	+10%	71%	75%	NA	80%	74%
Tehama		73%		+9%	69%	77%	68%	43%	72%
Trinity		73%		+9%	77%	75%	NA	NA	67%
Tulare	69%			+5%	66%	79%	58%	59%	73%
Yuba		70%		+11%	68%	77%	75%	54%	68%

NA - Not Available

Low Income, Urban

	Bottom	Middle	Top	Trend	Latino	White	African American	Asian	Other
Fresno	61%			+2%	63%	64%	63%	53%	60%
Stanislaus		71%		+9%	69%	78%	71%	65%	69%

NA - Not Available